Butler J Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. x. New York: Routledge.1995
Nelson, James B., and Longfellow, Sandra P. (eds.), Sexuality and the Sacred. London: Westminster John Knox Press. 2010 P. 213
Бок, Г. История, история женщин, история полов [Текст] / Г. Бок // THESIS. – 1994. – № 6. – С. 197.
Гендерная социокультурная парадигма – это доминирующий в обществе и культуре образец выстраивания гендерных отношений, определяющийся гендерными ценностями.
См.: Тищенко Ю. Г. Гендерные стереотипы современной студенческой молодежи: социологический анализ. Дис. на соиск.к.с.н. Ставрополь. 2014, с.37
Дежина Т. П. Трансформация гендерных стереотипов в семейных практиках жителей Дальнего Востока: дис. … канд. социол. наук: 22.00.04 / Дежина Татьяна Петровна. Хабаровск: Тихоокеан. гос. ун-т, 2007. С.34.
См.: Parsons, Talcott. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Prentice Hall NJ. 1966; Parsons, Talcott. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. Free Press. 1968; Parsons, Talcott. The Social System. Free Press. 1964
См.: Hacker, J.. & Jacobs. E. The rising instabilily of American family incomes, 1969–2004. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute. 2008
См.: Diekman, Amanda В., Wind Goodfriend. Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly 30, 2006, pp.360–383.
Marx, K. and Engels, F., The communist manifesto, Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1967 См. также: Marx К… Opere filosofiche giovanili, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1963; Marx K., Scritti inediti di economia politica, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1963; Marx K., Il 18 Brumaio di Luigi Bonaparte, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1964; Marx K., Il capitale, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1964–1966, 3 voli; Marx K., Forme economiche precapitalistiche, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1967; Marx K.. La questione ebraica e altri scritti giovanili, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1967; Marx K., La sacra famiglia, ovvero Critica della Critica critica. Contro Bruno Bauer e soci (opera scritta in collaborazione con Engels F.), Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1967; Marx K., Sulle società precapitalistiche, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1967; Marx K., Lettere a Kugelmann, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1969, ed. II; Marx K., Miseria della filosofìa. Risposta alla filosofia della miseria del signor Proudhon, Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1969, ed. III; Marx K., Teorie sul plusvalore. Libro quarto del “Capitale", Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1971; Marx K., L’ideologia tedesca. Critica della più recente filosofìa tedesca nei suoi rappresentanti Feuerbach, Bauer B. e Stirner e del socialismo tedesco (Opera scritta in collaborazione con Engels F.), Roma, Editori Riuniti, 1975; Marx K., Engels F., La Sacra Famiglia, Roma, Rinascita, 1954; Marx K., Engels F., Manifesto del partito comunista, Roma, Meltemi, 1998.
Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: International. 1942 (originai 1884). P. 41–43
Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: International. 1942 (originai 1884). P. 41–43
См.: Collins, R. Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press. 1975; Collins, R.. The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 1979; Dahrendorf, R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1959 (Original work published 1957) См. так же: Collins, P. Н… Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Koutledge, 2000; Collins, R. Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press, 1975; Collins, R. Is 1980s sociology in the doldrums? American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1336–1355, 1986; Collins, R. Max Weber: A skeleton key. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1986; Collins, R. Theoretical sociology. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988; Collins, R. Sociology: Proscience or antiscience? American Sociological Review, 54, 124–139, 1989; Collins, R. What does conflict theory predict about America’s future? Sociological Perspectives, 36(4), 1993, pp. 289–313; Collins, R. Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality and society, 5, 1993, pp. 203–230; Collins, R. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004; Dahrendorf, R. Essays in the theory of society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968; Dahrendorf, R. (1989). Straddling theory and practice: Conversation with Sir Ralf Dahrendorf. URL: http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/Elberg/Dahrendorf/dahrendorf2.html (дата обращения: 5 января 2014)
Lindsey, Linda L. Career paths in pharmacy: An exploration of male and female differences. Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago. 1984; Riley, P. J. & Kiger, G. Moral Discourse on Domestic Labor: Gender, Power, and Identity in Families. The Social Science Journal Vol. 36, No. 3, 1999 pp. 541–548. Lindsey, Linda L. The health status of women in Pakistan: The impact of Islamization. Midwest Sociological Society, Minneapolis. 1988; Lindsey, Linda L. Gender and the workplace: Some lessons from Japan. Midwest Sociological Society, Kansas city, 1992. См. так же: Lipovskaya, Olga. The mythology of womanhood in contemporary ‘Soviet’ culture. In Anastasia Posadskaya and the Moscow Gender Centre (eds.), Women in Russia: A New Era in Russian Feminism. London: Verso. 1994; Lippa, Richard. Gender, Nature, and Nurture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2005; Lippa, Richard. The preferred traits of mates in a crossnational study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 36(2) 2007, pp. 193–208.
См.: Tichenor Veronica Jaris. EarningMore and Getting Less: Why Successful Wives Can't Buy Equality. New Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005
Эверстова К.Н. Перспективы сокращения разницы между заработными платами мужчин и женщин в российской федерации URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2012/12/18952 (дата обращения: 5.01.2015)
Данные исследования, проведенные фондом WageIndicator. URL: http://www.mojazarplata.ru/main/zarabotok/karta-mira-gendernye-razlichija-v-oplate-truda (дата обращения 1.01.2015)
* Источники: Eurostat, OECD
** Рейтинг основан на сочетании следующих факторов: Экономическое участие и возможности, Уровень образования, Здоровье и образ жизни, Политические права и возможности. Данные показывают относительное благополучие женщин в конкретно взятой стране. Индекс 1 означает, что благополучие женщин в данной стране лучше, чем в любой другой.
Источник: Данные исследования, проведенные фондом WageIndicator. URL: http://www.mojazarplata.ru/main/zarabotok/karta-mira-gendernye-razlichija-v-oplate-truda (дата обращения 1.01.2015)
См.: Gimcnez, M. “Marxism and class, gender, and race: Rethinking the trilogy,” Race, Gender & Class, 8(2) 2001, pp. 23–33. Lareau. A. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2004. См. так же: Ferdman, В. The color and culture of gender in organizations: Attending to race and ethnicity,” in The Handbook of Gender and Work, ed. G. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999
Гендерная асимметрия – непропорциональная представленность социальных и культурных ролей обоих полов (а также представлений о них) в различных сферах жизни. Источник: Гендерная ассиметрия//Словарь гендерных терминов. URL: http://www.owl.ru/gender/016.htm (дата обращения: 5.01.2015) См. также: Айвазова С. Г. Русские женщины в лабиринте равноправия. М.: ЗАО "Редакционно-издательский комплекс Русанова", 1988.
Sherry Beth Ortner. Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1), 1984 pp. 126–166; Sherry Beth Ortner. Making Gender: The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.1996
Blumer, Herbert.. Symbolic lnteractionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1969
Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks. Calif.: Sage. Anderson. Nels. 1923; Deutscher, Irwin & Linda Lindsey. Preventing Ethnic Conflict: Successful Cross-. National Strategies. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2005, p.5
Fenstermaker, S. and West, C. Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change. Nueva York: Routledge, 2, 2002
См.: Goffman, Èrving. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press. 1963.
Kim Janna L., C. Lynn Sorsoli et al. From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on prime time network television.” Journal of Sex Research 44(2), 2007, pp. 145-57.
Walzer, Susan. Redoing gender through divorce. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25(1), 2008, pp. 5-21.
Smith, Dorothy. 'Theorising as ideology", in Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974, pp. 41 -4; Smith, Dorothy. 'Women's perspective as a radical critique of Sociology", Sociological Quarterly, 44: 1974, 7-13. Smith, Dorothy. ‘A peculiar eclipsing: women’s exclusion from men’s culture'. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1, 1978; Smith, Dorothy. The Everyday World As Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Buckingham: Open University Press. 1987; Smith, Dorothy. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston. MA: Northeastern University Press. 1990; Smith, Dorothy. Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge. 1990; Chafeiz, J. S. Sex and advantage. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. 1984; Chafetz. J. S. Gender equity. Newbury Parte, CA: Sagc. 1990; Chafctz, J. S., & Dworkin. G. Female revolt. Totowa. NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. 1986
Brod, Harry. Scholarly studies on men: The new field is an essential complement to women’s studies. In Estelle Disch (ed.), Reconstructing Gender: A Multicultural Anthology, New York: McGraw-Hill. 2003
Worell J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact ofsociety on gender Vol. 1. San Diego. CA: Academic Press. 1996 P. 360; Worell, J. Opening doors to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20. 1996 pp. 469–485; Worell, J.. Chandler, R. Personal Progress Scale. Unpublished manuscript. University of Kentucky. Lexington, 1996. См. так же: Worell, J. Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology. and Clinical Psychology. 46, 1978 pp. 777–791. Worell, J.. Gender in close relationships: Public policy vs. personal prerogative. Journal of Social Issues. 49(3), 1993, 203–218. Worell, J. Feminist interventions: Life beyond symptom reduction. Psychology of Womrn Quarterly, 24. 2000; Worell, J.. Etaugh, C. Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 18, 1994, pp. 433–450. Worell, J.. Stiliseli, D., Robinson, D., Oakley, D. Educating about women and gender: Cognitive, personal. and professional outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23. 1999
См.: Павенков О.В. Теоретические основы изучения ценностей в социогуманитарном знании// Гуманитарное знание: сб. научных статей/Под общ. ред. Г93 В.Г. Егоркина. – Вып.6. – СПб.: Астерион, 2007(серия «науч. горизонты»); Павенков О.В. Проблемы изучения ценностей в философском знании (Аристотель, Виндельбанд, Г. Риккерт, М. Шелер, Н. Лосский) // Материалы международной конференции молодых ученых "Человек. Природа. Общество. Актуальные проблемы". СПб, 2010; Павенков О.В. Ценностные ориентации учащейся молодежи// Студенчество – будущая элита общества[Текст]: тезисы докладов Международной научно-практической конференции ученых аспирантов, студентов. СПб, 2009. С. 116–120
Williams R.M. Jr. The concept of value // International encyclopedia of the social sciences, xii, ed. D.L.Sills, 1968; Pepper, S.C. The sources of value. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958
Wright, E.O. Classes. London, 1985. P. 449
Willi, V.J. Grundlagen einer empirischen Sociologie der Werte und Wertsysteme, Zurich: Orell, 1966. P. 118
Folsom, J. K. Changing values in sex and family relations // American Sociological review 2, 1937. P. 717
Цит. по: Kmieciak Wertstrukturen und Wertwandel in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Göttingen: Otto Schwartz & Co., 1976. P. 147
McLaughlin, B. Values in behavioral science // Journal of religion and health 4, 1965. P. 258–279