Хюбшер Артур. Не стала ли философия излишней? В книге «Мыслители нашего времени (62 портрета)». М., Изд-во ЦТР МГП ВОС, 1994, с. 49–50.
Hawking S. & Mlodinow L. The Grand Design. London, Bantam Books, 2001, p. 13: «Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics. Scientists have become the bearers of the torch of discovery in our quest for knowledge. The purpose of this book is to give the answers that are suggested by recent discoveries and theoretical advances. They lead us to a new picture of the universe and our place in it that is very different from the traditional one, and different even from the picture we might have painted just a decade or two ago».
Susan Haack (born 1945) is Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Sciences, Professor of Philosophy, and Professor of Law at the University of Miami.
Haack Susan. The Real Question: Can Philosophy Be Saved? At http://againstprofphil.org/susan-haacks-the-real-question-can-philosophy-be-saved/
Ibid: «How did this happen? Some of the problems are the result of changes in the management of universities affecting the whole academy: the burgeoning bureaucracy, the ever-increasing stress on “productivity”, the ever-spreading culture of grants-and-research-projects, the ever-growing reliance on hopelessly flawed surrogate measures of the quality of intellectual work, the obsession with “prestige”, and so on. And some of the problems are the result of changes in academic publishing: the ever-more-extensive reach of enormous, predatory presses that treat authors as fungible content-providers whose rights in their work they can gobble up and sell on, the ever-increasing intrusiveness of copy-editors dedicated to ensuring that everyone write the same deadly, deadpan academic prose, the endless demands of a time- and energy-wasting peer-review process by now not only relentlessly conventional but also, sometimes, outright corrupt, and so forth».
Ibid: «I don’t believe either that we can simply hand philosophical questions over to the sciences to resolve, or that only questions resoluble by the sciences are legitimate».
Текст приводится по изданию: Страбон. ГЕОГРАФИЯ в 17 книгах. Репринтное воспроизведение текста издания 1964 г. М.: «Ладомир», 1994. В: http://ancientrome.ru/antlitr/t.htm?a=i26ooioooo (июнь 2018).
В: http://eurasialand.ru/txt/gusev/15.htm (июнь 2018)
В: http://rushist.com/index.php/philosophical-articles/2930-filosofiya-ogyusta-konta-kratko (июнь 2018).
В: http://selena-luna.ru/knigi-j-like-vidimom-na-diske-luny (апрель 2017).
Solomonick Abraham. A Theory of General Semiotics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.
В: http://mshist.com/index.php/philosophical-articles/2214-mir-idej-i-mir-veshchej-u-platona (июнь 2018).
Чанышев А.Н. Курс лекций по древней и средневековой философии. Москва, «Высшая школа», 1991, с. 80–81.
Лурия А.Р. Лекции по общей психологии. Изд. дом «Питер», 2004, с. 38.
Морозов С.В. Объемный подход к рассмотрению моделей Солнечной системы. Реальность и субъект, 2001, том 5, № 4, с. 49–54.
В: https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=swkFW8anOcL3UL_ru KgM&q (май 2018).
В: http://www.newsocio.ru/nspgs-539-1.html (май 2018).
Чанышев А.Н. Курс лекций по древней и средневековой философии. Москва, «Высшая школа», 1991, с. 83.